"The steel mills, big suppliers to many sectors of the economy, are shutting 17 of the nation’s 29 blast furnaces — a startling indicator of how quickly output is declining as corporate America struggles to adjust to the spreading crisis."
(N.Y.Times)
It would seem we are now entering phase two of a three phase process whereby the United States (and the world) fall into deep recession. The official numbers are not in yet, but it's all but obvious that the current path will be passing by some bleak territory. Phase one consisted of the crafty mortgage lending that led to structural fallout--still with us--and the efforts to restore liquidity. We are of the opinion that such efforts will ultimately show slow success, in that the financial entities that need to be functioning, will be functioning, with few large scale collapses going forward.
The second phase consists of the rest of the economy adjusting to reflect the credit crunch and falling demand, and primarily in the form of layoffs and descending commodity prices. Just today a friend called, employee in a small medical business run by a husband and wife team; the wife was particularly panicked and reading a lot of books about world doom, evil central banks, collapsing societies and the merits of stockpiling gold. She gave a kind of heads up, assuring our friend of her job's stability, unless, situations changed. "Do you have people who, you know, own land, or people you can stay with?" asked her boss and McCain supporter bizarrely.
It's a particularly excited time for those whose main mental pursuits have consisted of predicting world collapse year after year, hoping coincidence knights them with wisdom. They are probably at climax right now, though reality will not prove as dire as their veiled hopes. The stockpiled gold will not soar into the stratosphere and render them king of the mountain in some long awaited new world structure.
In our third phase, (any good theory needing phases to sound compelling), the layoffs that are starting to roll now and that will continue on into 2009 will push us into a new massive wave of home foreclosures.
Barring some presidential wackiness, everything will right itself, or rather, reset itself to more normal valuations. Not sure exactly how that will happen, but should it not happen, then we will be quite worried indeed.
*
The Middle East, however, is ready for doom. Or, according to this article, impervious to it. Is it Islamic banking? Is it the light of the true view of God? Is it oil?
"So far, Gulf countries have contended they are largely insulated from the crisis circling the world, in part because of an oil money cushion they built during years of high oil prices."
(CNN)
I don't know, but I am thinking that the same forces at work everywhere will not take a vacay in Dubai, and as oil prices continue to drop, certain Middle Eastern nations won't fare so well. Which means it's good they are ruled by kings who can pretty much make the complainers shut up when the banks start foreclosing on everyone's second vacation tent. No doubt they too need an Obama, who in their version would be a Bill Smith and rumored to be connected to peace mongers and the secret choice of evil America.
The Washington Post gives us an even rosier view, suggesting that Middle Eastern hubs are seeing a rise in Americans hoping to work there. Fresh off of layoffs and laying waste to the American financial scene, they are looking for a fresh start. Apparently, while French (ha French!), Brits and Swiss are being hired, there are fewer Americans actually on the ground. Something about our reputation:
"Those who seek to move here will have to overcome a number of stereotypes about Americans, people here warn: that Americans don't know very much about the world, that their style in business negotiation tends to be too aggressive, that they demand high salaries and that they have trouble adjusting to life overseas."
(Washington Post)
We remain completely sure that if McCain manages to pull off his current job interview (uhm, just work with us here), Palin will be able to change the perception that Americans don't know anything about the world. "When Putin's head looms over your horizon..." she will tell Dubai during her first visit to the Emirates, inspiring confidence all around.
*
Meanwhile U.S. choppers may or may not be doing someting in or near the Syrian border that is annoying the Syrians. If we were kind of left wing we would raise our eyebrows and call pre-election shenanigans. But we've never been the type to think any American president would do such things merely to tilt the electorate: in broader policy, perhaps, but in battlefield decision, no. So another shenanigan-free incident.
*
As government continues to tweek its purpose for the $700 billion bailout funds, there are no shortage of folks who are calling for direct help of the homeowner. Of course weeding out the worthy from the "were not gonna help you" is a near impossible and time consuming task. The Washington Post reports that:
"Now, more than 30 percent of properties in the foreclosure process are owned by someone with a different address, indicating the home is likely owned by an investor, according to foreclosure listing service RealtyTrac Inc."
In other words, a good portion of the folks falling into trouble do not deserve any assistance at all unless it truly is the government's task to insure all of our investment decisions against the risk of loss.
Further, the article points out that a huge number of homeowners owe more than their homes are worth, and one must ask the question, again, if it's the government's job (meaning the taxpayers) to assist those who made bad investment decisions, even if the home is their primary residence. Would this create a precedent, or would this wave of home buyers and investors be uniquely rewarded for faulty financial decision making?
"Already, 23 percent of homeowners with a mortgage owe more on their loans than their homes are worth, and that figure is expected to rise to 28 percent by this time next year, according to Moody's Economy.com."(Washington Post)
The article shows several complications that make structuring a bailout for the homeowner challenging. Indeed it is far simpler, and probably wiser, to shore up the financial institutions, regulate them better, and assume that many of the homeowners will be beyond reach. It's won't be politically popular, which tells you it's probably the right path.